Fawzi Mohamed wrote:
On 2009-06-07 10:47:47 +0200, Christian Kamm
<[email protected]> said:
bearophile wrote:
The following code even crashes LDC during the compilation, I'll ask in
the LDC channel:<
The good ChristianK has already added it:
http://www.dsource.org/projects/ldc/ticket/320
And thankfully Frits van Bommel has already fixed it: it consumes
about 40kb
of heap memory at runtime now.
This seems to be because we don't use the _d_arrayappend functions at all
but emit a _d_arraysetlength instead. What's the memory growing
behavior of
that function? Should this be considered a bug?
I would say that setlength should not allocate extra space, because one
should trust that the user knows his needs
char[] x;
x.length = 100; // setlength allocates memory
