bearophile wrote: > Brad Roberts: >> I'm not particularly excited about the way this looks, but take a peek:< > > I can see names like: > > LDC > LLVM > LLVM64 > Win64 > Win32 > Windows > D_Version2 > > => > > They may become more orthogonal, and there's no need to keep both LDC and > LLVM: > > Bit_64 > Bit_32 > Windows > Linux > Compiler_LDC > Compiler_DMD > Compiler_GDC > Stdlib_Phobos > Stdlib_Tango > D_Version_1 > D_Version_2 > And some more. > > Bye, > bearophile
My goal wasn't to start a complete overhaul of the identifiers. That'd cause way more grief than just creating the list for only a small amount of gain. Later, Brad
