Re: [:] as empty associative array literal, plus warning for null

[Dicebot]

On Thursday, 4 July 2013 at 23:25:38 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
Where does the whole "stronger typing" comes in? This is 
poppycock. We need real arguments here.

Andrei

More values typeof([]) can be implicitly converted to - weaker 
typing, that simple. Actually I'd love to be able to specify 
precisely typed empty array literal, like [uint] or [uint:bool] 
but can't find a good syntax to propose. Currently array literals 
are very special and is does harm the type system.