On 07/30/2013 10:59 AM, Dicebot wrote: > Well, I think simply no one finds it worth discussing until there is actual > implementation for such facility proposed ;)
Fair enough, code speaks. :-) It's just that no one seems to have pointed out this part of the problem before. I always feel it's worth raising an idea even if there's not the time to work on it personally, because someone else might like it and want to run with it.
