Re: Template functions, can we make it more simple?

[monarch_dodra]

On Friday, 2 August 2013 at 21:36:38 UTC, SteveGuo wrote:
Note that currently this is parsed as having _only_ PARAMTYPE.

I just tested _only_

void foo(_only_ a)
{
}

but the compiler complaints "undefined identifier _only_"

<facepalm />

He meant that when you only have a single token it is parsed as 
PARAMTYPE and not varname.

EG:

void foo(int);