grauzone: > I also find it ironic how Walter tries to keep D C compatible (that is, > C code compiled by dmd either runs correctly, or compilation fails), > while such differences between D1 and D2 seem to be OK. (Examples: > const, memory allocating closures, overloading rules)
Walter is right here, C is used by millions of people, while D1 is kinda unknown. D1 will vanish, C will be around for some more years. So keeping compatibility with C is much more important than keeping compatibility with D1. Bye, bearophile
