On Wednesday, 7 August 2013 at 14:12:32 UTC, eles wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 August 2013 at 02:27:42 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 8/6/2013 4:28 PM, MattCoder wrote:
It simply isn't enough to create a great product.
I did try. At my job. Basically, answers that I received were
like: "it's unfinished." (they meant language is changing and
tools are immature)
I do not know if it is helpful of not, or if it is true or not.
But these were the answers that I received.
What I perceived: language should state on those several
ambiguous issues (@property was quoted, complex numbers) and
tools should get some maturity (the .so thing for one).
Yea, I don't like how you have to write properties in D. I
usually write them like this:
@property {
int myNum() {
return _myNum;
}
void myNum(int value) {
_myNum = value;
}
}
I saw that in the D conf it was stated that @property will be
changed? I was wondering if there is any progress on that and how
will the new properties look like? Are they going to be replaced
by templates or something else? Has anyone written his own
property generators?
