On Friday, 9 August 2013 at 11:46:42 UTC, eles wrote:
On Friday, 9 August 2013 at 11:30:54 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On Friday, 9 August 2013 at 00:34:31 UTC, JS wrote:
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 17:55:04 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
[...]
As always, providing motivating use case and advantage/cost
comparison is usual requirement to make something happen.
DIP's exist for a reason.
Are you not smart enough to come up with use cases yourself?
On Friday, 9 August 2013 at 03:29:20 UTC, JS wrote:
On Friday, 9 August 2013 at 00:57:21 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
C'mon, guys, cool down. Both (or the three) of you are right.
Some tend to forget that everybody here is a volunteer, so there
is no such such thing as a duty. Others are enthusiastic and
throw in ideas. People are of different kinds, sparks appear
sometime.
That is *exactly* why a proposal should be backed with a use
case. The people implementing them are *also* volunteers. Their
time is just as valuable. Putting in personal effort reduces the
burden of the implementors, and increases the chances of said
proposal to go through (or at this point even be considered
seriously).
Really, all I'm seeing is "I have this proposal; fuck you if you
don't think it's good, I don't have any time to waste to explain
it to you"... Well, in that case, OK. I don't have time to
consider it either. Moving on.
