Re: A suggestion on keyword for_each

[Tobias Pankrath]

On Friday, 9 August 2013 at 14:51:05 UTC, Tyler Jameson Little 
wrote:
Also, I don't particularly like for_reverse, since you can't 
use a traditional for-loop syntax with for_reverse:

    // would be syntax error
    for_reverse (i = 0; i < 5; i++) {}

What do you think would be proper semantics for this?