bearophile wrote:
grauzone:
Just that LDC (why not mention it directly?) is starting to become more
stable than DMD, while the .NET port is in an early alpha stage at best.
I agree with you, mentioning LDC name there is better. This part of the article
is bad.
And LDC is getting quite stable, I'm using it on Linux with good results.
I think the main missing parts of LDC (but please correct me if I am wrong) is
that is lacks still: exception on Windows, built-in profiler, built-in code
coverage. Once those three things are in place then LDC can replace DMD in most
situations (I don't know much about the code coverage in LDC, I'll ask on IRC).
In the context of the article it's missing another pretty major feature: actual
support for pretty much anything new in D2.0...
