On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 15:13:38 +0200 "Kagamin" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Saturday, 10 August 2013 at 18:35:10 UTC, Nick Sabalausky > wrote: > > Would it be > > acceptable to use gmake as *the* make for DMD? Ie, either > > convert the > > windows makefiles to gmake, or expand the posix makefiles to > > support > > windows? > > 1. expand posix makefiles to support windows > 2. leave dm makefile for those who doesn't have gmake > 3. use unified posix/windows makefile > 4. everyone is happy That still involves the overhead of maintaining duplicate makefiles and a tendency for gradual divergence.
