Am Thu, 22 Aug 2013 16:00:06 +0200 schrieb Robert Schadek <realbur...@gmx.de>:
> I'm still missing a logging facility in D and as the last attempt seam > to have stopped I want to throw > in my version. After reading through the std.log thread I made my > conclusions and created my own > logger. People seamed to be unhappy with the naming and the way of > configuration. > Additionally when to throw or not to throw seamed to be an argument. > > My attempt is to provide a very small functional interface to logging. > IMO it is impossible to fulfill > all requirements a D developer can have through configuration classes > and such, I designed the > a abstract Logger class that can be easily implemented to one's own > needs. > > As a quick start feature I created a Stdio- and File-Logger. If no > Logger is provided to the log > function a defaultLogger will be used. > > Docu: > http://burner.github.io/phobos/phobos-prerelease/std_logger.html > > Pull Request: > https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1500 > > > I hope this will lead to some progress in phobos, when it comes to > message logging. > It would be nice to finally have logging in phobos. Two small nit-picks: The API doesn't follow the phobos naming conventions: functions (error, fatal, ...) need to start with a lowercase letter. Same for enum members. See http://dlang.org/dstyle.html I guess the function string for writeLogMsg is fully-qualified? I'd like to see module and function split into two parts. Or fully-qualified function + module so the fully qualified function name can be sliced to strip the module name: auto fn = func[module.length .. $]
