D2 is in danger of becoming a camel i.e. a horse designed by a
committee...
Frank.
?
As far as I know, the 'committee' consists of a gang of three, with Walter
firmly at the driving seat, all working very hard to flesh out a language,
create an innovative library and quality compiler. All the tools and
libraries you mention are being created. In addition there's also LDC which
is shaping up nicely. Not to say everything is already here, but that is a
question of time and manpower, not direction.
What's up with all the negativity lately? Impatience?
Some people think D2 tries too much, and neglects the really important
things at the same time. For example, D2 tries to solve the concurrency
issue (which is a hot topic which makes D look good at sites like
stackoverflow), while still relying on a 20 years old linker written in
assembler.
