On 8/25/2013 12:14 AM, H. S. Teoh wrote: [...]Ok, you had thrown me off by saying it wasn't about dtors. It is all about dtors :-) I think it is an implementable proposal.
However, I tend to agree with Andrei's comment on the utility of it.
- Re: DIP44: scope(class) and scope(struct) Tobias Pankrath
- Re: DIP44: scope(class) and scope(struct) Dmitry Olshansky
- Re: DIP44: scope(class) and scope(struct) Andrei Alexandrescu
- Re: DIP44: scope(class) and scope(struct) Walter Bright
- Re: DIP44: scope(class) and scope(struct) Ramon
- Re: DIP44: scope(class) and scope(struct) Tobias Pankrath
- Re: DIP44: scope(class) and scope(struct) Walter Bright
- Re: DIP44: scope(class) and scope(struct) H. S. Teoh
- Re: DIP44: scope(class) and scope(struct) Walter Bright
- Re: DIP44: scope(class) and scope(struct) H. S. Teoh
- Re: DIP44: scope(class) and scope(struct) Walter Bright
