On Sunday, 25 August 2013 at 21:01:54 UTC, bearophile wrote:
[* Hijacking of discussion: a while back I think I floated the
idea of generalizing iota() with closed/open boundary
conditions similar to those found in std.random.uniform; so
e.g. you could do iota!"[]"(0, 10) and the upper bound would
be included in the values returned. Would be useful for cases
like these.]
Yes, it's a kind of necessary enhancement:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10466
Bye,
bearophile
If somebody were to implement this, I would *love* to review it.
