On Monday, 26 August 2013 at 01:16:21 UTC, Paul Jurczak wrote:
You still have a chance, because I don't quite get it. With the little I know about Haskell, I find this code very elegant. What is wrong with it? Performance?
It's a huge blowup in time complexity. They say that Lisp programmers know the value of everything and the cost of nothing... That's probably true of Haskell programmers as well.
