On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 03:13:11 +0200 "Ramon" <[email protected]> wrote: > Apologies if this is the wrong forum or even the wrong place but > it seems to me there is a kind of tight connection between dlang > and dsource.org (to which the following relates). > [...] > > Let me, however, also share my experience and feelings as a > (exited and pleased) newbie to D when one finds out that what > seems to be easily 2/3rd of seemingly available modules are > "dead, exitus, this bird is passed away, gone, dead, and only > sitting there because someone drove a nail through the poor > animal" or, at best optimistically pre-early-alpha (speaking with > a friendly grin). >
FWIW, most of the D community has moved from dsource to github. The things remaining on dsource are mostly going to be older things. > > I'd like to suggest therefore that we begin to mildly weed out > dead or stuck-in-dream stage modules or at least discreetly mark > them as RIP. > That's a very good point, I agree that may be a good thing to do.
