Re: assert() vs. enforce(), invariant() vs. ... ?

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2013-08-29 23:16, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:

No, I mean std.typecons.Proxy:
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_typecons.html#.Proxy
The point is that std.typecons.Proxy _just_ wraps the underlying type;
it doesn't, so far as I can see, allow you to define extra functionality
that must be implemented whenever a public method of the underlying type
is called.

Oh, that Proxy. What's the point of it? The example looks like just an 
"alias this".

--
/Jacob Carlborg