Jason House wrote:
There is still debate over exactly what will go into D2. Which features of
Bartosz's design do you like? Dislike? Some feedback may help the offline
discussion.
I would need to have a long think about this. I think a language that is
designed for nothing but parallelism may benefit a lot and D could do
with some as a next generation language.
s ~= " ";
Here the syntax looks atomic but the semantics is not because of the
length property. I was kind of thinking I liked this locking, then
thought maybe too much overhead or verbose when I didn't need the lock.
I think everyone can agree on a dislike for a verbose notation so I hope
D can make the most of angle brackets and colons to minimize this.
