On Tuesday, 3 September 2013 at 00:05:04 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 9/2/2013 4:57 PM, Dylan Knutson wrote:Can someone shed some light on this?It comes from C. This was done in C so that addresses of struct instances will always be unique.
So, because backwards compatibility is an important consideration, what type of code breakage might one expect if D was to implement zero-size structs?
