On Tuesday, 3 September 2013 at 16:33:55 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Sure, but I did provide demonstration, that thread. The OSS
zealots repeatedly make arguments that are wrong, irrelevant,
and worst, just completely out of left field. This is a common
pathology when you have decided on your conclusion and are
arguing backwards from it: your arguments don't make any sense
and come out of left field.
They have decided that open source is good and closed source is
bad, just like the global warming zealots, and will make silly
arguments to try and justify that, even to someone like me who
is trying to carve out a place for open source. You may agree
with their conclusion and therefore defend their arguments, but
any impartial observer wouldn't.
You seem confused by the difference between saying something and
providing conclusive evidence.
