On Wed, 04 Sep 2013 13:25:06 +0200 "Dicebot" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wednesday, 4 September 2013 at 11:23:53 UTC, Jacob Carlborg > wrote: > > On 2013-09-04 13:18, Nick Sabalausky wrote: > > > >> I think I just copy-pasted it from somewhere. It is really > >> better to do > >> the "[email protected]:blah/blah.git"? > > > > As far as I know, yes. > > git:// is faster > https:// is less likely to be blocked by various firewalls and > filters > > Choice is yours :) Ok, in that case, it sounds like https is better for right now, but it would be good to have an optional flag to use git:// instead. Actually, maybe it should try git:// and if it fails, then try https://. But that can probably wait. The important thing is to get this working.
