On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 02:32:40PM +1000, Manu wrote: > On 8 September 2013 05:04, Walter Bright <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Recent threads here have made it pretty clear that VisualD is a > > critical piece of D infrastructure. (VisualD integrated D usage into > > Microsoft Visual Studio.) > > > > Andrei, myself and Rainer (VisualD's champion) are all in agreement > > on this. > > > > What do you think? > > > > How about the bugs? > When I made the suggestion, other the obvious endorsement for the > project, I imagined the most significant outcome would be making > Visual-D's bug's first-class bugs as well. > Giving good visibility of IDE bugs to all contributors gives the whole > community a good sense of the health of this aspect of the ecosystem, > even of they don't contribute to the IDE integration themselves...
Good point. Should we integrate the bugs into the current D bugtracker as well? It would seem counterproductive to have the repo under the "official" dlang github organization yet have two separate bug trackers. T -- There is no gravity. The earth sucks.
