On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 08:23:07PM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: > On 09/09/13 20:05, Jesse Phillips wrote: > >I think DDOC should be improved to handle this scenario. Being able > >to generate docs with undocumented members would be great for > >internal development of the module. I realize that doesn't address > >all your problems, but I think that is the correct direction. > > Better DDoc is always going to be nice, but come on -- that doesn't > address the issue of looking at code in a diff or a copy-paste via > chat software, and in the scenarios Manu has described, no one's going > to have time to write documentation comments. > > OK, you could have a DDoc setting to at least _list_ all elements of > class interfaces etc., even if there's no doc comment, but that > doesn't address the other factors.
Auto-generation of .di files solves this problem. (Provided we fix the mess that is the current implementation of .di generation, of course.) T -- It said to install Windows 2000 or better, so I installed Linux instead.
