On Wednesday, 11 September 2013 at 06:28:30 UTC, Sönke Ludwig
wrote:
Am 11.09.2013 00:06, schrieb luminousone:
Projects that haven't had an update for an excessive amount of
time should likely be hidden but still available except in
cases
where it is known to be unchanged without need for updates(such
as most wrappers).
Agreed. Maybe some other knowledge, such as how many other
(active) packages depend on it, or how often it is still
downloaded, can help to get a robust automatic measure.
Simple idea: try to build the package via current DMD. If
compilation false then the package too old (or we have DMD
regression). So, it would be nice to have package autotester like
for DMD/Phobos repositories.
