On 9/11/2013 3:15 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I'm not against it, but I find it a very small improvement. Its user base is exactly people who want to write and deploy a template without ever testing it at all, ever. I have a hard time catering to that hypothetical crowd.
I'm against it because it makes for a rather bastardized semantic pass - expensive to specify, write and debug, and as you point out of highly suspect merit.
Note that even so, uninstantiated D templates must lex and parse correctly regardless.
