On 12 September 2013 08:31, Meta <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wednesday, 11 September 2013 at 12:00:19 UTC, Nick Sabalausky > wrote: > >> There's a relatively recent derivative of the "dub" music genre called >> "dubstep" <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dubstep>. More recently, >> "dubstep" begat a derived genre of...random noises...called >> "brostep". The quintessential "brostep" recording person is probably >> "Skrillex". This is what Skrillex sounds like, along with the reaction >> it typically gets: >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6Mti91l2Sc >> >> That's probably one of his *better* tracks, actually. Basically, >> take the random noises that radio stations like to stick between >> songs and extend it to fill a CD. If you accidentally stumble upon the >> beginnings of a beat or melody, cease immediately. That's basically it. >> Apparently he won a Grammy for that. >> >> Still, at least it's not Taylor Swift. > > > Dubstep is old news. *Monkstep* is where it's at. >
Monkstep? Pfft... Folkstep is the way forward. ;-) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3fTw_D3l10 -- Iain Buclaw *(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';
