On 14 September 2013 18:11, H. S. Teoh <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 11:35:26AM +0200, Robert Clipsham wrote: >> On Friday, 13 September 2013 at 21:00:14 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote: >> >On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 01:40:02PM -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu >> >wrote: >> >Syntax highlighting hurts my eyes. I've been using vim in >> >black-on-white for more than a decade now. (Well, more accurately, >> >black on an almost fully saturated off-white, but that's irrelevant.) >> > >> > >> >T >> >> Have you taken a look at solarized? I used to find my eyes straining >> after a few hours with syntax highlighting until I started using it, >> now I can stare for days at a time without issue. >> >> http://ethanschoonover.com/solarized > [...] > > Nah, it's still too rainbow-y for me. I still prefer no syntax > highlighting. >
I thought Zenburn was the go to syntax highlighting scheme for those who work in low light settings. :-) -- Iain Buclaw *(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';
