On Tuesday, 17 September 2013 at 16:48:44 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Tuesday, 17 September 2013 at 16:34:01 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Tuesday, 17 September 2013 at 15:31:00 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Discussion has slowed down and thread is fading away.
I personally have not noticed any crucial objections (ones
that can't be figured out during normal pull request review
process). Brian, what is your state on this? Is there
something you want to add/change before the voting gets
initiated?
I had some comments that nobody addressed. Mostly about firing
several instances of the lexer with the same identifier pool.
Well, I suppose only Brian can address it :) I am only checking
if there are no commonly repeated objections that are likely to
ruin the voting. There are plenty of comments of course and I
would recommend Brian to at least make some statement about
those before voting but that is his call.
There is a possibility to mention one issue as a blocker when
voting though, that will be taken into consideration when
counting actual votes.
I've been busy with things that aren't D-related recently, but I
should have time the rest of this week to address the lexer.
