On Wednesday, 11 September 2013 at 18:29:09 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
On 9/11/13, Kagamin <[email protected]> wrote:
I'd say, strong handles shouldn't act as pointers (and
shouldn't
contain pointers), so null shouldn't work.
"NULL" is already used in a ton of WinAPI C/C++ code and MSDN
documentation, it would be a major pain in the ass to have to
use e.g.
HWND(0) instead.
In my experience writing a winapi call already takes some effort
and specifying HANDLE(0) instead of NULL doesn't add any
comparable difficulty.
