"BCS" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... > Reply to Ary, > >>>> But for that the only thing he need to do is to tell us URLs for the >>>> latests zip files to download. >>>> >>> Oh, it's one of the kind of installer I have no use for. Sorry missed >>> that bit. >>> >> Why not? >> > > I have no like for installers that don't contain (in the installer I > download) the data they are supposed to install (I'll use them if there is > no other way to install the program). I've already stated my reasons > several times in this thread, but in short: I want an installer that has > no dependencies (particularly no net dependencies) other than things like > Windows (tm). I want to be able to archive it and know it will install the > same version later, no matter what the rest of the world does. Most of the > other uses being tossed about for an installer I would rather do via > something else (like SVN). >
Yea, this is why I'm convinced that, at least at some point, we'll want to have both kinds available, because there are a lot of people on both sides of that fence (I'm somewhere in between, fwiw).
