Re: std.allocator needs your help

[Namespace]

On Tuesday, 24 September 2013 at 22:39:27 UTC, Andrei 
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 9/24/13 3:11 PM, Namespace wrote:
I would rather want new to be overloadable and have 2 sets of 
parameters

new (allocator)(arg1, arg2)

Where "allocator" would go to the overloaded version of new 
and "arg1"
and "arg2" will be passed to the constructor.

+1

We're banning that syntax of new.

Andrei

What's wrong with this syntax?
And: *That* syntax or complete 'new' as built-in feature?