On 29 September 2013 18:57, Joseph Rushton Wakeling <[email protected]> wrote: > On 29/09/13 12:25, Iain Buclaw wrote: >> >> Not following dmd's way of doing things is nothing new however... > > > I don't understand why the solution wasn't (or couldn't be) designed from > the start to work with all three D compilers. Can anyone offer an > explanation? >
Many bad things get implemented in dmd without discussion. -- Iain Buclaw *(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';
