On Friday, 4 October 2013 at 10:30:56 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
There is an alternative risk -- that people will be more inclined to just throw stuff over the wall into stdx because, hey, it's an experimental/testing area, the whole idea is for people to try out imperfect code and work out what's wrong with it ...

And to be 100% clear - I meant this dub category to be moderated and only filled after formal review process. We simply need some place for modules which got conceptually approved but can't yet meet API stability and/or implementation quality required for inclusion into Phobos as-is.

Reply via email to