On 04/10/13 23:12, Brian Schott wrote:
On Friday, 4 October 2013 at 21:09:26 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
It's now 98% :-)
That's not fair! You're not triggering any bugs in the coverage analyzer. :-)
Well, unless you count the fact that an assert statement split across 2 lines
registers as one line covered and one line not, because the error message
doesn't get printed, which happens because the code works correctly ... :-)
It's got me ever so slightly miffed that if only I was prepared to have an
uncivilly long line in the code, I'd be on 99% instead.
