On Wednesday, 9 October 2013 at 13:57:03 UTC, Sean Kelly wrote:
They aren't opt-out for really any reasonable project though, because code is reused and those people may want at least the standard attributes to be set. Personally, the array of attributes that can be applied to a D function is one of my biggest pet peeves with the language. It gains me nothing personally, and adds a lot of extra thought to the process of writing a function.
This is exactly what I was speaking about. It would have been much more easy if stuff was `pure @safe immutable nothrow` by default and one added `dirty @system mutable throw` on per-need basis after getting compiler error. But that is too late to change and this attribute inference may be only reasonable option.
