On Sunday, 13 October 2013 at 16:20:33 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Sunday, 13 October 2013 at 12:39:55 UTC, Abdulhaq wrote:
[…]
Unfortunately the wrapping is based on QtJambi, which is now
dead, but anyway it's easy with hindsight isn't it.
Is anyone else interested and can anyone help me with
polishing it? […]
I'm very interested in having solid Qt bindings available, and
I worked on QtD a while back.
One thing I've been wondering about is whether keeping the
QtJambi-based generator makes sense or if it would be easier
start anew from some of the more active binding projects…
David
Perhaps KDE's SMOKE?
http://techbase.kde.org/Development/Languages/Smoke
