On 10/14/2013 02:51 PM, Andrea Fontana wrote:
> Just for comparison, on Android you can write something like:
> FileLogger.w(...) instead of FileLogger.log(LogLevel.Warning...)
>
> (and there's a "wtf" loglevel for "temporary" debugging)
>
hm, I don't really like it. To me it sounds like, "I'm don't care about
log level just print this". Maybe changing the LogLevel type to an int
like "debug(int) { " would be an idea and than providing some immutable
int Info = 1, Debug = 256, Error = 1024 ... would be a idea.
- Re: Early review of std.logger Vladimir Panteleev
- Re: Early review of std.logger Robert Schadek
- Re: Early review of std.logger Martin Drasar
- Re: Early review of std.logger Robert Schadek
- Re: Early review of std.logger Martin Drasar
- Re: Early review of std.logger Robert Schadek
- Re: Early review of std.logger Martin Drasar
- Re: Early review of std.logger Dicebot
- Re: Early review of std.logger Dicebot
- Re: Early review of std.logger Andrea Fontana
- Re: Early review of std.logger Robert Schadek
- Re: Early review of std.logger SomeDude
- Re: Early review of std.logger Byron
- Re: Early review of std.logger ilya-stromberg
- Re: Early review of std.logger Jeremy Powers
- Re: Early review of std.logger Jeremy Powers
- Re: Early review of std.logger Robert Schadek
- Re: Early review of std.logger Jeremy Powers
- Re: Early review of std.logger Brian Schott
- Re: Early review of std.logger Dicebot
- Re: Early review of std.logger Jeremy Powers
