On 10/14/2013 11:10 PM, Guillaume Chatelet wrote: > > It is useful but it's also a pain to configure. I used logback ( > http://logback.qos.ch/ ) which is a bit nicer but still... We should > definitely step away from XML's configuration mess. Did somebody say XML, I first cast a stone. ;-) But seriously, XML does not come to my mind when I think a flexible KISS logging library.
- Re: Early review of std.logger Sönke Ludwig
- Re: Early review of std.logger Robert Schadek
- Re: Early review of std.logger Sönke Ludwig
- Re: Early review of std.logger Robert Schadek
- Re: Early review of std.logger Jacob Carlborg
- Re: Early review of std.logger Dicebot
- Re: Early review of std.logger Guillaume Chatelet
- Re: Early review of std.logger Jeremy Powers
- Re: Early review of std.logger Guillaume Chatelet
- Re: Early review of std.logger Jeremy Powers
- Re: Early review of std.logger Robert Schadek
- Re: Early review of std.logger Vladimir Panteleev
- Re: Early review of std.logger Robert Schadek
- Re: Early review of std.logger Martin Drasar
- Re: Early review of std.logger Robert Schadek
- Re: Early review of std.logger Martin Drasar
- Re: Early review of std.logger Robert Schadek
- Re: Early review of std.logger Martin Drasar
- Re: Early review of std.logger Dicebot
- Re: Early review of std.logger Dicebot
- Re: Early review of std.logger Andrea Fontana
