On 2013-10-16 21:08, simendsjo wrote:
Remove all would probably be more in sync with getAttributes that returns all attributes, but removing only the first would allow greater flexibility. It's easy to remove all if you have a way to remove one, but the other way around isn't as easy :)
How would you remove all? I guess something like this: !@(foo, foo)But how can that be generalized? Unless we get a trait for removing attributes.
-- /Jacob Carlborg
