Re: Early review of std.logger

[Robert Schadek]

On 10/18/2013 03:49 PM, Dicebot wrote:
> On Friday, 18 October 2013 at 13:35:19 UTC, Robert Schadek wrote:
>> On 10/18/2013 02:55 PM, Dicebot wrote:
>>> Can you please re-generate the documentation after all recent updates?
>> I usually do that. The only documentation missing is for MultiLogger, as
>> I'm not sure if the current implementation is done.
>
> Hm. I don't see anything related to Logger names there. It is supposed
> to be part of MultiLogger?
>
> As discussion was slowly fading I wanted to make some sort of summary
> for this thread judging by personal observations - having quick
> overview of current state in form of docs will be helpful.
I rebuild the docs and pushed them. MultiLogger docu is just a stub.