On Friday, 18 October 2013 at 17:19:17 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 18 October 2013 at 17:06:57 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
But if we're gonna do it, I say we should go all the way:
And make scope the default parameter thingy, and implement it.
God I want some kind of escaping check thing so badly, it is
supposed to work already!
Yeah it is astonishing how many holes in type system implementing
that single small thing can fix. I wish it never was in
documentation, that way I would not have bothered me that much at
least :)
