On Friday, 25 October 2013 at 17:57:23 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
25-Oct-2013 16:52, Jacob Carlborg пишет:
On 2013-10-25 02:01, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:

Oddly enough this can be actually done.

with (setAllocator!Mallocator)
{
   ...
}

setAllcator returns an rvalue that changes the global allocator to the Mallocator in the constructor, and restores it to whatever it was in the
destructor.

Wouldn't this be very unsafe? Say you call another function inside the with-statement and that function assumes the standard GC for allocating
memory.


Very true. To put it simply it's a disastrous idea that sadly is too easy to be ignored.

IMHO we'd better start with containers and refitting Phobos from built-in AA/arrays to user-defined containers. One interesting way there is to accept/adopt containers as OutputRange.
Did you mean to get rid of built-in arrays / kill int[] and replace it with Array!T?

Reply via email to