On 2013-10-25 15:10, Lionello Lunesu wrote:
There's a lot of expressiveness that can be added to D bindings, when
compared to the C or C++ headers, for a particular library:
I agree with what others have said. I can add that I sometimes use three
layers.
1. The actual C bindings. Stay as close as possible to the original code
2. Slightly D-ify the C bindings. I.e. be able to pass D strings instead
of C strings
3. Create wrappers. Either object oriented with classes or something in
between, like structs with some internal sate and a couple of methods
--
/Jacob Carlborg
