On 28/10/13 21:22, Joakim wrote:
Really? The claims that llvm has a cleaner codebase, is easier to use because it's all properly split up into different libraries, and introduces new features like better error reporting: that's all "PR?"
It's my understanding from Iain's talks that the GCC backend is now much cleaner and friendlier than it used to be. I don't know how that compares to LLVM, but it may be that reports of the relative cleanliness of the two codebases are out of date.
