On Tuesday, 29 October 2013 at 04:28:24 UTC, evilrat wrote:
On Monday, 28 October 2013 at 22:25:12 UTC, Flamaros wrote:
On Sunday, 27 October 2013 at 08:08:08 UTC, Steve Teale wrote:
Any progress?
There is no way to do something best with llvm?
I don't really understand why for static and dynamic libraries
we need rely on OS implementation. llvm intermediate byte
code isn't fast enough translatable at runtime?
Actual binaries format on Windows and Linux seems old and
limited, I dream of cross platforms compilers that are based
on binaries format that contains all necessary information to
be able to operate correct inlining,...
maybe our childrens will see it one day :)
It makes me sad :(
It's a real strength that VM based language have to be binary
inter-operable. A lot of Java developers don't see C/C++ as
portable languages just cause of the necessity to rebuild
binaries on each OS even their runs on same architecture.
to be honest, many C/C++ developers don't think it is portable,
so Java developers are not alone here O_-
