On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 00:46:05 UTC, Xiaoxi wrote:
On Wednesday, 30 October 2013 at 21:15:37 UTC, Ali Çehreli
wrote:
On 10/29/2013 10:55 AM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> Continuing the conversation from the following thread:
>
> http://forum.dlang.org/post/[email protected]
Kenji Hara added there:
=====
The combination of closure variables + scoped destruction
should
be rejected, but currently it isn't. It's a compiler bug.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11382
Kenji Hara
=====
Ali
kenji is right. compilation error is the only safe approach, if
you do not wish scoped destruction, don’t request it in the
first place! dangerous operations like this should be explicit
to avoid surprises, not hidden in complicared implicit special
cases.
This is wrong in a point that accessing object or not running
destructor is not safe: closures can touch any object, not only
structs, making them allocated in heap, and there are many cases
when struct destructors are not called.
