On 11/04/2013 06:52 AM, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 1:55 AM, Timothee Cour
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>
>> I guess I'll have to write a CT-compatible LALR(1) engine...
>>
> D does not fit into LALR(1), you need glr.
>
>
> Well, too bad. GLR is also on my plate, but I fear its cubic behavior
> (IIRC, it degrades gracefully, though).
Thats one part, and even worse is that you need a decider function if
more than one rule accepts.
> Do you know what part of the D grammar makes it non-LALR(1)?
I had big trouble with the IdentifierList rules.
