On Wednesday, 6 November 2013 at 20:52:41 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Wednesday, 6 November 2013 at 15:34:54 UTC, Jesse Phillips
wrote:
1. http://blog.jessta.id.au/2012/06/gos-sort-package.html
Hmm... if sort.Sort accepts a sortable interface, they could
define those 3 methods for respective arrays so that they would
satisfy the interface, and sort.Sort would accept them
transparently. Well, if go allows extending array's interface.
It does not. A specific type must be created and the functions
defined for it. Was one of the first WTFs I hit. It doesn't solve
the lack of generics problem, which is much more important.
