On Thursday, 7 November 2013 at 19:21:49 UTC, Michael wrote:
So, @ for UDA only? +1
First, there is no point in "+1", it will never be in D as it is major breaking change :) Just some interesting experiment in similar but much younger language.
Second, no, it is not "@ for UDA only". It is "@ for everything that does not impact ABI, including all UDA and some built-in stuff like @public/@private/@package".
